Developing Higher Order Thinking Skills Assesment Instruments on Invironmental Pollution Material for Class VII

Asra Indah(1*), Azrita Azrita(2), Rona Taula Sari(3),

(1) Universitas Bung Hatta
(2) Universitas Bung Hatta
(3) Universitas Bung Hatta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The seventh grade science teacher at MTsN 3 Kota Pariaman has problems in developing an instrument for assessing higher order thinking skills. In the 2013 curriculum, teachers are required to be able to provide questions in the C4-C6 domain, namely High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). This study aim to produce a valid and practical assessment instrument for higher order thinking skills on environmental pollution material at the C4-C6 cognitive level. The background of this research is that the questions made by the teacher are still at the C1-C3 level and there are still obstacles for teachers in developing higher order thinking skills assessment instruments, while in
the 2013 curriculum teachers are required to be able to provide questions in the C4-C6 domain. This type of research is research development (Research and Development) which is a research method used to produce certain products. This type of research uses 3 stages of the 4-D model, namely the define, design and develop stages.Based on the research conducted, a very valid assessment instrument of 3,32 was produced by the
validator, the empirical validity there were 30 valid questions and 10 invalid questions, the reliability in this study was 0,77 with the category of reliability, 94,79% teacher practicality and practicality. students amounted to 80,80%, the difficulty level of the questions was between 0,31 to 0,70 with moderate criteria and the question difference had sufficient criteria. This research can be used as a reference for other researchers related to the development of higher order thinking skills assessment instruments.

Keywords : High Order Thinking Skills, Validity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L. W., and Krathwohl, D.R. 2001. A Taxonomy of Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. A Revision of Bloom’sTaxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York Longman. 41,(4): 212-218.

Arikunto, S. 2012. Evaluasi Pembelajaran (Prinsip, Teknik, Prosedur). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Barnett, J. E and Francis, A.L. 2012.Using higher order thinking question to foster critical thinking: a classroom study. Educational Psychology: An International journal of Experimental Educational Psychology. 3,(2): 209-216.

Budiani, S., Sudarmin., Syamwil, R. 2017. Evaluasi Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 di Sekolah Pelaksana Mandiri.Innovative Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology (IJCET). 6,(1): 45-57.

Gloria, R.Y. 2012. Pentingnya Asesmen Alternatif Dalam Meningkatakan Kemampuan Berpikir Dan Membaca Ilmiah Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Biologi. Jurnal Scientiae Educatia. 1,(1).

Hamzah, A. 2013.Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika.Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada. 400 Hal.

Heale, R., Twycross, A. 2015. Validity and reliability in quantitative studies.Evid Based Nurs. 18, (3): 66-67.

Heong, M. Y., et.al. 2011. The Level of Marzano Higher Thingking Skills Among Technical Education Students. International Jurnal of Social Science and Humanity.1,(2): 121-125.

Istiyono, Mardaphi, Suparno. 2014. Pengembangan Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (Pysthots) Peserta Didik SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. 1, (1)

Ita. 2018. Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif Berbasis Inkuiri. BIOEDUKASI: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi. 11,(1): 23-28

Julistiawati., Rini., Bertha Y. 2013. Keterampilan Level C4,C5 dan C6 Revisi Taksonomi Bloom Siswa Kelas X.3 SMAN 1 Semenep pada Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Pokok Bahasan Larutan Elektrolit dan Non Elektrolit. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education. 2,(2): 37-62.

Khumaedi, M. 2012. The Reliability Of Education Research Instrumen. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin. 12,(1): 25-30.

Kunandar. 2015. Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013).Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada. 415 Hal.

Kurniati, Dian. 2016. Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa SMP di Kabupaten Jember Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Berstandar PISA. Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan 20,(2): 142-155

Mardapi, D. 2012. Pengukuran, Penilaian, Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika. 375 Hal.

Muliyardi. 2006. Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Matematika Menggunakan Komik di Kelas 1 Sekolah Dasar. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya (UNNESA).

Nofiani, M., Sajidan., Puguh. 2016. Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Higher Order Thingking Skills Pada Materi Kingdom Plantae. Jurnal Pendagogi Hayati. 1,(1): 67-80.

Nurwanah. 2019. Pengembangan Butir Soal Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi Kelas XI SMA Negeri 3 Pangkep. Skripsi. Makasar. Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makasar.

Putri, S. R. 2018. Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Pada Materi Keanekaragaman Hayati Untuk Peserta Didik SMA/MA Kelas X. Skipsi.Padang. Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP).

Permendikbud No 53 Tahun 2015.Penilaian Hasil Belajar Pendidik pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah.

Riduwan.2012. Pengantar Statistika Sosial. Bandung: Alfabeta

Rahayuni, G. (2016). Hubungan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Kritis dan Literasi Sains pada Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu dengan Model PBM dan STM. Jurnal penelitian dan pembelajaran IPA. 2,(2): 131-146.

Rofiah, Emi, Nonoh, S. A., Elvin, Y. 2013. Penyusunan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Fisika Pada Peserta Didik SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika. 1,(2): 17-22.

Rosidah, N. A., Ramalis, T. R., Suyana, I. 2018. Karakteristik Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis (KBK) Berdasarkan Pendekatan Teori Respon Butir. Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika.1,(3):54-63.

Sari, R. T. 2017. Uji Validasi Modul Pembelajaran Biologi Pada Materi Sistem Reproduksi Manusia Melalui Pendekatan Kontruktivisme Untuk Kelas IX SMP. Scientie Educatia. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains. 6,(1):22-26

Safitri, W. R. 2017. Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi pada Materi Virus untuk Peserta Didik Kelas X. Skripsi. Padang. Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP).

Saputra, Hatta. 2016.Pengembangan MutuPendidikan MenujuEra Global: Penguatan Mutu Pembelajaran dengan Penerapan HOTS (High Order ThinkingSkills). Bandung: SMILE’s Publishing.

Schraw, G et al. 2011. Assesment Of Higher Thinking Skilss. America: Information Age Publishing.

Siskandar dan Basrowi. 2012. Evaluasi Belajar Berbasis Kinerja. Bandung: Karya Putra Darwati

Sudarmin. 2012. Meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi mahasiswa melalui pembelajaran kimia terintegrasi kemampuan generik sains. Varia pendidikan. 42,(1): 97-103.

Tika, D. R., Bambang, H. R., Sukidin. 2014. The Analyis of Difficulaties and Distinguishing Power on The Middle Test With From of Multiple Choice on Odd Semester at Economic Subjects on The Tenth Grade of SMA Negeri 5 Jember in 2012/2013 Academic Year. Jurnal Edukasi UNEJ. I,(1): 39-43.

Van de Walle, J. A. 2007. Elementary and Middle Schoolmathematics: Teaching Developmentally, (6th Ed.). United States of America: Pearson Education, In

Widodo, T., Kadarwati, S. 2010. Higher Order Thingking Berbasis Pemecahan Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Berorientasi Pembentukan Karakter Siswa. Cakrawala Pendidikan. 32,(1): 161-171




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31327/jbse.v3i1.1434

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 801 times
PDF - 407 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Asra Indah, Azrita Azrita, Rona Taula Sari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

INDEXED BY:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------