Merapi’s Lahar Benefit at Putih River, Magelang

Ahmad Syukron Prasaja(1*),

(1) UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Damage to settlements and agricultural land due to lahar in 2011 still leaves a mark that cannot be forgotten. The lahar disaster was caused by the collapse of the material from the eruption of Merapi Volcano which had accumulated in the upstream due to rainfalls having an average intensity of about 40 mm in 2 hours that occurs at rainy season from November to April. Putih River is one of river that effected by lahar disaster. This research wants to know community income before and after lahar disaster and usefulness of lahar material for community that affected by lahar disaster. The method to reach the aim are structure and in-depth interviews with people that effected by lahar disaster. The result is most of community that effected by lahar disaster has income increase by Rp12,500 until Rp100,000 per-day and the community can use the material lahar that deposit around Putih River by selling it as building material, and then they can build a building according Contractor, BPS, and Community standard.


 

Keywords


Benefit, Lahar disaster, Putih River, Merapi Volcano, and Income

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. (2002). Prosedur Penelitian, Suatu Pendekatan Praktek (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). 2014. Statistik Daerah: Kecamatan Salam. Mungkid; Badan Pusat Statistika Kab. Magelang.

Kumalawati, R. et al., (2012). Mapping of Lahar Risk in Salam, Magelang, Central Java. The 2nd ACIKITA International Conference on Science and Technology. Jakarta: ACIKITA.

Kumalawati, R. et al., (2013). Klasifikasi Kerusakan Permukiman Akibat Banjir Lahar Menggunakan Model Builder GIS. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendayagunaan Informasi Spasial 2013. Surakarta: IGI, BIG, and UMS.

Kumalawati, R. et al., (2014). Managing lahar susceptibility area (Case study in Kali Putih, Magelang, Indonesia), 5th International Conference on Sustainable Future for Human Security, Bali: SustaiN.

Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W., 1970. Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Emmitsburg: Educational and Psychological Measurement.

Lavigne, F. T. (2000). Lahar at Merapi Volcano, Central Java: An Overview. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal, Vol 100, 423-456.

Maruyama, Y. 1980. Applied Study of Geomorphological Land Classification on Debris flow Control Planning in The Area of Mt. Merapi, Central Java, Indonesia. 10th International Conference of The International Cartographic Association.

Mei et al., 2013. Lessons Learned From The 2010 Evacuations At Merapi Volcano, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, Volume 261, Hal 348–365.

Suharsimi, A. (1966). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek . Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Voight, B., Davis, M.J., Emplacement temperatures of the November 22, 1994 nue´e ardente deposits, Merapi Volcano, Java, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, Volume 100 (2000), Hal 371–377.

Wijayanti, A. R.W., 2013. Perubahan Pekerjaan Masyarakat Sebagai Akibat Dari Bencana Studi Kasus: Kawasan Wisata Volcano Tour Gunung Merapi, Desa Umbulharjo, Kecamatan Cangkringan, Kabupaten Sleman, Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Vol. 24 No. 1, Hal.19 – 34.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31327/gsej.v1i1.1115

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 840 times
PDF - 432 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


    E-ISSN : 2716-4837        P-ISSN: 2723-6560

   


INDEXED BY:

 

 

 

Web Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter View My Stats

Flag Counter

 

This journal is published by the USN Scientific Journal Publisher
Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
Jalan Pemuda No. 339, 93517 Kolaka, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia
Copyright © 2020 USN Scientific Journal (USNSJ)

Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise noted, Geographica: Science and Education Journal (GSEJ) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.