DEVELOPMENT OF ETHNOMATHEMATICS-BASED EXAMPLE–PROBLEM PAIRS WITH ISOMORPHIC PROBLEMS TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ INDUCTIVE THINKING SKILLS IN GEOMETRIC TRANSFORMATION
(1) Univeritas Negeri Yogyakarta
(2) Univeritas Negeri Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study aims to develop an ethnomathematics-based Example–Problem Pairs with Isomorphic Problems (EPP-IP) instructional design to improve students’ inductive thinking skills in geometric transformation learning. The study was motivated by the low level of students’ inductive thinking skills and difficulties in understanding geometric transformation concepts, which are often taught abstractly and procedurally without meaningful connections to students’ cultural contexts and real-life experiences. To address these issues, the instructional design integrates ethnomathematics, Example–Problem Pairs, and isomorphic problems to create contextual, systematic, and meaningful mathematics learning experiences.
This research employed a Design and Development Research (DDR) approach using the ADD model, which consists of analysis, design, and development stages. The instructional materials were designed by incorporating local cultural elements such as traditional woven motifs and geometric cultural patterns into geometric transformation concepts, including translation, reflection, rotation, and dilation. The Example–Problem Pairs strategy was combined with isomorphic problems to support students in identifying patterns, making generalizations, and transferring conceptual understanding to different problem contexts.
The developed instructional design was evaluated in terms of validity, practicality, and effectiveness. The validation process involved mathematics education experts, instructional design experts, and practitioners. The results indicated that the ethnomathematics-based EPP-IP instructional design was valid and practical for classroom implementation. Furthermore, the implementation of the instructional design showed positive effects on students’ inductive thinking skills, conceptual understanding, learning motivation, and engagement in geometric transformation learning.
The findings suggest that integrating ethnomathematics with Example–Problem Pairs and isomorphic problems can provide meaningful mathematics learning experiences and effectively improve students’ inductive thinking skills in geometric transformation. Therefore, this instructional design can serve as an innovative alternative for mathematics learning that promotes both conceptual understanding and cultural appreciation.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
REFERENCES
Access, Open. 2019. “The Cognitive Load of Learners in the Learning Process of the Rotating Object Volume The Cognitive Load of Learners in the Learning Process of the Rotating Object Volume.” https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012046.
Alghiffari, Eka Kevin, Rully Charitas, Indra Prahmana, dan Brian Evans. 2024. “The impact of Ethno-Realistic Mathematics Education-based e- module in strengthening students ’ problem - solving abilities” 10 (June): 546–66. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v10i3.26611
Ambrosio, Ubiratan D. 2014. “Pedagogy of Mathematics” 5 (1): 44–48.
Learning, Boredom, and Junior High School Students 2018. "The Effectiveness of Rational Emotive Behavior Counseling for Lowering Behavior" 1 (1): 32–41. https://www.ijlter.net/index.php/ijlter/article/view/447
Kalyuga, Slava. 2011. “Informing : A Cognitive Load Perspective” 14.
Lestari, Natalia Putri, dan Agus Suyono. 2024. “Exploring geometry and measurement in the Perjuangan Subkoss Garuda Sriwijaya Museum : An ethnomathematics study” 10 (June): 652–65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384640093_Exploring_geometry_and_measurement_in_the_Perjuangan_Subkoss_Garuda_Sriwijaya_Museum_An_ethnomathematics_study
Puspa, Riya Dwi, and Abdur Rahman. 2020. "Students' Cognitive Burden in Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)-Oriented Mathematics Learning," no. 2009, 1768–76. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i12.14325
Renkl, Alexander. 1997. “Learning from Worked-Out Examples : A Study on Individual Differences.” : https://www.researchgate.net/publication/33026973
Sweller, John. 2019. “Cognitive load theory and educational technology.” Educational Technology Research and Development, no. 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3.
Vanlehn, Kurt. 2020. “Teaching Algebraic Model Construction : A Tutoring System , Lessons Learned and an Evaluation.” https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003386131.
John Sweller, Paul Ayres, & Slava Kalyuga (2011) “Cognitive Load Theory”
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4
Michelene T. H. Chi, et al(1989)“Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems” https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0010028589900025
Kurt VanLehn (1998/updated works) “Analogy Events: How Examples Are Used During Problem Solving”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0364021398000170
Fred Paas & Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer (1994) “Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills”
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02300521
Richard E. Mayer (2009) “Multimedia Learning (2nd Edition)” learning/6e5c8f1d4b3f5d8f0e5c4f5d8f0e5c4f
https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/multimedia
Roland Brünken, Jan L. Plass, & Detlev Leutner (2003) “Direct Measurement of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X03000106
Alexander Renkl (2014)
“Toward an Instructionally Oriented Theory of Example-Based Learning”
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-013-9252-5
Paul A. Kirschner, at el (2006) “Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X06000087
Fred Paas, at el (2003) “Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X02000141
Slava Kalyuga, at el (2003) “The Expertise Reversal Effect”
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1025086900784
Rolf Schwonke et al. (2009)
“The Worked-Example Effect: Not an Artifact of Testing Conditions”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X09000316
Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer & John Sweller (2005) “Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning”
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000) “Principles and Standards for School Mathematics”
https://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/Principles-and-Standards/
George Pólya (1973) “How to Solve It”
https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691119663/how-to-solve-it
Richard R. Skemp (1976) “Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding”
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3619188
Jean Piaget (1972) “The Psychology of the Child”
https://www.basicbooks.com/titles/jean-piaget/the-psychology-of-the-child/9780465095001/
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 180 timesPDF - 171 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 David Baitanu, Marsigit marsigit
![]() |





