The Role of Metacognitive Monitoring and Control in Overcoming Cognitive Overload during the Impasse Phase

Rika Wahyu Saputri(1*), Surya Sari Faradiba(2), M. Mahmudi Prasetiyo(3),

(1) Universitas Islam Malang
(2) Universitas Islam Malang
(3) Universitas Islam Malang
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study was motivated by the urgency of the phenomenon of cognitive overload, which often triggers a phase of impasse or mental block in students when solving contextual mathematics problems. This condition causes students to often rush to apply irrelevant calculation procedures without analyzing the structure of the problem, resulting in strategic failure. This study aims to describe in depth the dynamics of students' metacognition, particularly the monitoring and control functions, and to analyze the effectiveness of visualization strategies in reducing this cognitive load. The research method used is a qualitative approach with a descriptive-exploratory design. The research subjects included junior high school students who were tested on their ability to solve PISA-type questions. Data collection was carried out using the Think Aloud Protocol (TAP) technique to record students' mental processes and verbalizations in real time when they encountered a deadlock. Data analysis techniques were carried out systematically through the stages of verbal data transcription, data reduction, visual presentation, and conclusion drawing, which were validated through interview triangulation. The results showed that the monitoring of metacognitive function plays a vital role as an early detection mechanism that helps students recognize anomalies between their tentative answers and the logic of the problem. Furthermore, the control strategy through image visualization proved effective in reducing extraneous cognitive load, enabling students to transform abstract representations into concrete ones and find the turning point for solving the problem. In addition to improving cognitive accuracy, successfully overcoming this impasse phase simultaneously increases students' self-efficacy or self-confidence. These findings recommend the importance of integrating metacognitive interventions in learning to build students' mathematical resilience.


Keywords


Cognitive Overload, Impasse Phase, Metacognition, Think Aloud Protocol, Visualization

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, A., & Barth-Cohen, L. (2024). Exploring Student Sensemaking When Engaging with Anomalous Data. CBE Life Sciences Education, 23. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-08-0208

Ademmer, C., & Prediger, S. (2025). How Can Ideas Be Connected Afterwards ? Decomposing Teachers ’ Facilitation Practices for Conceptual Learning in a Case of Formal Volume Calculation How Can Ideas Be Connected Afterwards ? Decomposing Teachers ’ Facilitation Practices for Conceptual Learning in a Case of Formal Volume Calculation. Cognition and Instruction, 43(4), 355–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2025.2527688

Alali, R., & Wardat, Y. (2024). Exploring students’ mathematical literacy: The role of Self-efficacy and learning environment. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i8.2838

Andrian, D., Hidayat, R., & Dacara, E. (2025). The Effect of Realistic Mathematics Education Approach to Improve Students ’ Mathematics Learning Outcomes. 12(1), 74–85.

Bakar, M. A. A., & Ismail, N. (2020). Express Students’ Problem Solving Skills from Metacognitive Skills Perspective on Effective Mathematics Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8, 1404–1412. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080433

Barbosa, A., & Vale, I. (2021). A Visual Approach for Solving Problems with Fractions. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110727

Chen, O., Castro-Alonso, J., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2018). Extending Cognitive Load Theory to Incorporate Working Memory Resource Depletion: Evidence from the Spacing Effect. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9426-2

Dahiana, W. O., Herman, T., Nurlaelah, E., & Pereira, J. (2023). Student Semiotic Representation Skills in Solving Mathematics Problems. 4185(2009), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v10i1.30770

de Bruin, A. B. H., Kok, E. M., Lobbestael, J., & de Grip, A. (2017). The impact of an online tool for monitoring and regulating learning at university: overconfidence, learning strategy, and personality. Metacognition and Learning, 12(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-016-9159-5

Diarni, I. M., Ikhsan, M., Zaura, B., & Johar, R. (2023). Profile of Students ’ Mathematical Understanding through Diagnostic Tests Viewed from Multiple Intelligences. 4185, 77–92. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v10i1.31965

Güner, P., & Erbay, H. (2021). Metacognitive Skills and Problem-Solving. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 715–734. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.1594

Guo, S., & Liao, S. (2025). The relationship between trait- and state-math anxiety and math engagement: The role of math learning context and task difficulty. The British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12746

Hadi Sopandi, Supratman, & Sinta Verawati Dewi. (2024). The concept structure of student in mathematical literacy. Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M), 7(2), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.30762/f_m.v7i2.3757

Hidayati, N., Sukestiyarno, Y., Pujiastuti, E., Sugiman, S., & Waluya, S. (2025). Students’ mathematical literacy in terms of metacognitive awareness. Infinity Journal. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i4.p839-860

Jatmiko, J., Retnawati, H., & Rohman, A. (2025). Planning strategy through reduce cognitive load of secondary school students: Brief metacognitive development analysis. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i4.6429

Khasawneh, E., Gosling, C., & Williams, B. (2021). What impact does maths anxiety have on university students? BMC Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-021-00537-2

Larmuseau, C., Cornelis, J., Lancieri, L., Desmet, P., & Depaepe, F. (2020). Multimodal learning analytics to investigate cognitive load during online problem solving. Br. J. Educ. Technol., 51, 1548–1562. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12958

Masduki, M., Kholid, M., & Khotimah, R. (2020). Exploring Students’ Problem-solving Ability and Response towards Metacognitive Strategy in Mathematics Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8, 3698–3703. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080849

Medrano, J., & Miller?Cotto, D. (2025). Understanding working memory as a facilitator of math problem?solving: Offloading as a potential strategy. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 871–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12767

Niyazova, G. B., Utemov, V. V., Savina, T. N., Karavanova, L. Z., Karnaukh, I. S., Zakharova, V. L., & Galimova, E. G. (2022). Classification of open mathematical problems and their role in academic achievement and motivation of students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(8). https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/12265

Nuryadi, N., Sukestiyarno, Y., Suyitno, H., & Kharisudin, I. (2024). Mathematical Critical Thinking Profile Of Students On Pisa Framework Space And Shape Content Questions Reviewed From Self-Efficacy. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i4.1228

Paas, F., & Van Merriënboer, J. (2020). Cognitive-Load Theory: Methods to Manage Working Memory Load in the Learning of Complex Tasks. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29, 394–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420922183

Parwati, N. N., & Suharta, I. (2020). Effectiveness of the Implementation of Cognitive Conflict Strategy Assisted by e-Service Learning to Reduce Students’ Mathematical Misconceptions. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., 15, 102–118. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i11.11802

Prasetiyo, M. M., & Walida, S. El. (2026). PROFILE OF ETHNOMATEMATICS IMPLEMENTATION IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING TO STIMULATE STUDENTS ’ COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT. 10(2025), 333–346.

Prasetiyo, M. M., Walida, S. El, Info, A., & Outcomes, L. (2026). IMPROVEMENT OF LEARNING RESULTS THROUGH THE WEEKLY PROJECT OF PROBLEM SCHEME WITH THE TEACHING AT THE RIGHT LEVEL APPROACH. 15–29.

Putri Hapsari, I., Victor Didik Saputro, T., & Damas Sadewo, Y. (2022). Mathematical Literacy Profile of Elementary School Students in Indonesia: a Scoping Review. Journal of Educational Learning and Innovation (ELIa), 2(2), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.46229/elia.v2i2.513

Putri, R. Y., Puspaningtyas, N. D., & Hadi, W. (2024). STUDENTS ’ MATHEMATICAL CREATIVE THINKING SKILLS IN SOLVING PISA PROBLEMS : A CASE IN INDONESIA. 9(2), 233–249.

Rafiq-uz-Zaman, M., Imtiaz, I., & Khalid, N. (2024). Innovative Integration of Environmental Awareness into Mathematics Education: Insights from Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions in Bahawalpur. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 13(4), 899–910. https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2024.13.4.72

Rifai, F., Prasetiyo, M. M., & Tsabitah, I. (2026). HEURISTIC STRATEGIES AS COGNITIVE BRIDGES IN SOLVING ARITHMETIC SEQUENCE WORD PROBLEMS : A CASE STUDY. 25–38.

Rosikhoh, D. (2024). Development of mathematics teaching materials: Internalizing Al-Qur’an, Hadith, Madurese culture, and religious moderation. Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 6(1), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.35316/alifmatika.2024.v6i1.120-136

Sawah, K. O., & Kusaka, S. (2025). The effect of metacognitive abilities on junior high school students in the Republic of Vanuatu when solving mathematical word problems. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i1.4935

Scheibe, D., Was, C., Dunlosky, J., & Thompson, C. (2023). Metacognitive Cues, Working Memory, and Math Anxiety: The Regulated Attention in Mathematical Problem Solving (RAMPS) Framework. Journal of Intelligence, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11060117

Scheja, B., & Rott, B. (2024). Mathematical tasks: a review of classification systems. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-024-00506-z

Starling-Alves, I., Wronski, M., & Hubbard, E. (2021). Math anxiety differentially impairs symbolic, but not nonsymbolic, fraction skills across development. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1509. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14715

Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2025). Creative self-efficacy, attitudes, creative style, and environmental literacy: Promoting mathematical creative thinking. Journal of Educational Research, 118(5), 475–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2025.2495329

Szabo, Z., Körtesi, P., Guncaga, J., Szabo, D., & Neag, R. (2020). Examples of Problem-Solving Strategies in Mathematics Education Supporting the Sustainability of 21st-Century Skills. Sustainability, 12, 10113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310113

Tachie, S. (2019). Meta-cognitive Skills and Strategies Application: How this Helps Learners in Mathematics Problem-solving. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/105364

Tanudjaya, C. P., & Doorman, M. (2020). EXAMINING HIGHER ORDER THINKING IN INDONESIAN LOWER SECONDARY MATHEMATICS CLASSROOMS. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11, 277–300. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.11000.277-300

Tomasetto, C., Morsanyi, K., Guardabassi, V., & O’Connor, P. A. (2021). Math anxiety interferes with learning novel mathematics contents in early elementary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(2), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000602

Tupamahu, P. Z., Ratumanan, T. G., & Laamena, C. M. (2023). Students ’ Mathematical Representation and Communication Ability in Mathematics Problem Solving. 4185(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v10i1.29376

Umam, K., Susandi, A. D., Irfan, M., Awang, M. L. Bin, Susanti, E. N., & Supandi. (2025). Mathematical creative thinking skills: Using APOS theory to identify student errors in solving contextual problems. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies. https://doi.org/10.69598/hasss.25.1.269211

Utaminingsih, S., Amalia, I., & Sumaji, S. (2024). Management of Mathematics Learning Based on Interactive Digital Worksheets to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Ability. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v13n1p159

Vadivu, P., Logeshwaran, S., Lakshmi, S., & Saravanan. (2025). Advancing Mathematical Problem-Solving through Metacognitive Learning Strategies: Innovations and Applications in Medical and Health Sciences. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i02.40715

William, S. K., & Maat, S. M. (2020). Understanding Students’ Metacognition in Mathematics Problem Solving: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 9(3), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v9-i3/7847




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31327/jme.v11i1.2701

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 96 times
PDF - 13 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Rika Wahyu Saputri


INDEXING DATABASE