Analysis of Mathematical Literacy Ability of Students in terms of Visual Learning Styles and Gender Differences

Dian Ulfa Sari(1*), Deti Sri Rahayu(2),

(1) Universitas Sembilanbelas Novemeber Kolaka
(2) Universitas Sembilanbelas Novemeber Kolaka
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The aim of this study was to determine the mathematical literacy skills of grade VIII students (male and female) based on visual learning styles at SMP Negeri (State Middle School) 2 Kendari. This study used an exploratory method with a qualitative approach. Results of the study indicated that: (1) as seen from solving problems related to quantity content aspect, female students with a visual learning style had not been able to pass the stage of using mathematical tools; on space and shape content aspect they were able to pass all stages; meanwhile on change and relationships content aspect the female students were also able to pass all stages. (2) seen from quantity content aspect to solve problem, male students with a visual learning style had not been able to pass the stages of formulating and planning strategies as well as using mathematical tools; on space and shape content aspect they were able to pass all stages; and on change and relationship content aspect, the male students were able to pass all stages.Female students with visual learning styles have not been able to go through one stage, namely the stage of using mathematical tools. While male students with a visual learning style have not gone through two stages, namely te stage of formulating and planning strategies then the stage of using mathematical tools.

Keywords


Literacy Skills; Visual Learning Styles; Gender

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amir., Z. (2013). Perspektif gender dalam pembelajaran matematika. Kajian Gender Dan Islam, 14–31.

Anggo, M. (2010). Proses Metakognisi Mahasiswa Calon Guru dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Disertasi. Tidak dipublikasikan. Surabaya: Univeraitas Negeri Surabaya.

Anisah, Z., Zulkardi, Z., Darmawijoyo, D. (2011). Pengembangan Soal Matematika Model PISA pada Konten Quantity untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5, 1–15.

Aydına, A., Uysal, Ş., & Sarıer, Y. (2010). Analysing the results of pisa maths literacy in terms of social justice and equality in educational opportunities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3537–3544.

Ekawati., A.Wulandari., S. &. (2011). Perbedaan Jenis Kelamin Terhadap Kemampuan Siswa dalam Mata Pelajaran Matematika (Studi Kasus Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 3(Februari), 19–23.

Geary, D. C., Saults, S. J., Liu, F., & Hoard, M. K. (2000). Sex differences in spatial cognition, computational fluency, and arithmetical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77(4), 337–353.

Haralambos, M., Holborn, M., Heald, R., & Trowler, P. (2004). Sociology: Themes and perspectives.

Ismael. (2012). Assessment and analytical framework. Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy.

Kartini, K. (2009). Peranan representasi dalam pembelajaran matematika. In Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika.

Maulana., A. & Hasnawati. (2016). Deskripsi Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII-2 SMP 15 Kendari. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 14.

Pendidikan, T. P. I. (2007). Ilmu dan Aplikasi Pendidikan. Grasindo, Jakarta.

Pisa, O. (2016). results: Excellence and equity in education. volume I. OECD publishing.

Rahmawati, M., & Penelitian, B. (2014). Literasi Matematika Siswa Pendidikan Menengah : Analisis Menggunakan Desain Tes Internasional dengan Konteks Indonesia 1 Mathematical Literacy of Students At Secondary Education Level : An Analysis Using International Test Design with Indonesian Context. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 20, 452–469.

Said., & S. (2003). Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Quantum Learning dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Agama Islam Di SMK-Pembangunan Pertanian Negeri Rea Timur Kabupaten Polewali Mandar. IAIN Parepare.

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kulitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31327/jme.v6i2.1459

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 491 times
PDF - 286 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Dian Ulfa Sari


INDEXING DATABASE