Analogical reasoning ability of mathematics education students at six state islamic universities (UIN) in Indonesia

Maifalinda Fatra(1), Lilis Marina Angraini(2*),

(1) Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University
(2) Universitas Islam Riau
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Mathematical abilities that students must possess at the level of primary and secondary education must also be possessed by a student of teacher candidates who will teach mathematics. One of the abilities is an analogical reasoning ability. The main objectives of this research are: 1) To describe and analyze analogical reasoning ability of students of mathematics education at the State Islamic Universities (UIN) in Indonesia, 2) To know the differences of analogical reasoning abilities of students of mathematics education at several State Islamic Universities (UIN) in Indonesia. The study was conducted at 6 UINs in Indonesia with a sample of 203 5th semester students using a survey method. This study's results indicate: 1) Analogical reasoning ability in Mathematics Education students consisting of 6 UINs in Indonesia can be seen from the average value in each sample. The acquisition of the average value of UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta students' analogical reasoning ability is the highest compared to the other 5 UINs with an average mathematical reasoning ability value of 65. 2. There is a difference in mathematics education students' analogical reasoning ability at the State Islamic Universities (UIN) in Indonesia.

Keywords


mathematical reasoning; analogical reasoning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Angraini, L. M., Kartasasmita, B., & Dasari, D. (2017). The effect of concept attainment model on mathematically critical thinking ability of the university students. JPhCS, 812(1), 012010. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012010

Ansjar, M. & Sembiring. (2000). Hakikat Pembelajaran MIPA dan Kiat Pembelajaran Matematika di Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

English, L. D. (1997). Analogies, Metaphora, and Images: Vehicles for Mathematical Reasoning. In Mathematical Reasoning analogies, Metaphora and Images edited by English, Lyn D: Law-rence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Hali, F. (2016). The effect of application of problem based learning against proportional reasoning ability based on vocational students’ achievement motivation. Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(2), 15–21. http://usnsj.com/index.php/JME/¬article/-download/JME003/pdf

Kaymakci, Y. (2016). Embedding analogical reasoning into 5E learning model: a study of the so-lar system. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(4), 881-911.

Loc, N. P., & Uyen, B. P. (2014). Using Analogy in Teaching Mathematics: An Investigation of Mathematics Education Students in School of Education-Can Tho University. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(7), 91-98. Retrieved from https://www.ijern.com/journal/July-2014/08.pdf

Magdas, I. (2015). Analogical Reasoning in Geometry Education. Acta Didactica Napocen-sia, 8(1), 57-65. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1064450.pdf

MAA. (2004). Undergraduate Programs and Courses in the Mathematical Sciences: CUPM Cur-riculum Guide 2004. Washington DC: The Mathematics Association of America Published.

Matlin, M.W. & Geneseo, S. (2003). Cognition (5th Ed). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Mawarni, T. A. T. (2020). Kemampuan Penalaran Analogi Matematis Melalui Model Pembelajaran Hands on Mathematics dengan Media Benda Konkret Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Visualizer dan Verbalizer. Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran, 15(19). Retrieved from http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jp3/article/viewFile/4933/5035

Amir-Mofidi, S., Amiripour, P., & Bijan-Zadeh, M. H. (2012). Instruction of mathematical con-cepts through analogical reasoning skills. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(6), 2916-2922.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Ramos. (2011). Analogies as tools for meaning making in elementary science education: how do they work in classroom settings? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Ed-ucation, 7(1), 29-39.

Rahmawati, D. I. & Pala, R. H. (2017). Kemampuan Penalaran Analogi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Euclid, 4(2), 689-798.

Ramdhani, S. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Analogis Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika dalam Persamaan Diferensial Ordo Satu. Jurnal Prisma: 6(2), 162-172.

Richland, L. E., Holyoak, K. J., & Stigler, J. W. (2004). Analogy use in eighth-grade mathematics classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), 37–60. Retrieved from http://reasoninglab.psych.ucla.edu/KH%20pdfs/Richand_etal.2004.pdf

Sumartini, T. S. (2015). Peningkatan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 1-10.

Susanti, G., & Rustam, A. (2018). The effectiveness of learning models realistic mathematics education and problem based learning toward mathematical reasoning skills at students of junior high school. Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(1), 33–39. DOI: 10.31327/jomedu.v3i1.534

Turmudi. (2008). Landasan Filsafat dan Teori Pembelajaran Matematika (Berparadigma Ek-sploratif dan Investigatif. Jakarta: Leuser Cita Pustaka.

Wahyudin. (2008). Pembelajaran dan Model-model Pembelajaran: Pelengkap untuk Meningkat-kan Kompetensi Pedagogis Para Guru dan Calon Guru Profesional. Bandung: IPA Abong.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31327/jme.v5i2.1243

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 504 times
PDF - 338 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Lilis Marina Angraini


INDEXING DATABASE