REALIZATION PRINCIPLE OF POLITENESS IN INTERNET DISCUSSION AMONG THREE HINDUS OF INDONESIAN DISCUSSION GROUP

Wayan Pageyasa(1*),

(1) Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to gain a deep understanding of the realization of the principle of politeness in internet discussion in three Indonesian Hindu discussion group. Realization of politeness principle consists of compliance and violations. The research paradigm was qualitative. The method used was the pragmatic content analysis and inductive procedures. The research data was in the form of quotations dialogue in internet discussion that contains the realization of the principles of politeness. The data was obtained from the written record dialog in Internet discussion in three Hindu Indonesia group discussions. The results showed that in general the principle of politeness tends to be obeyed. It means that those involved in internet discussion in three Indonesian Hindu discussion group were generally considered polite in speaking.

Keywords


realization; politeness principle; internet discussion

Full Text:

PDF

References


Achmad H.P. "Gaya Berpikir, Latar Belakang Pendidikan, dan Kemampuan Menulis Mahasiswa IKIP Jakarta dalam Tiga Aspek Wacana: Keterpaduan, Keruntutan, dan Kelengkapan." Disertasi, IKIP Jakarta, (1994).

Brown, Penelope dan Stephen C. Levinson. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. New York: Cambridge University Press, (1996).

Eelen, Gino. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jarome Publishing, (2001).

Eerdmans, Susan L., Carlo R. Prevignano, dan Paul J. Thibault. Language and Interaction: Discussion with John J. Gumperz. Philadelpia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, (2002).

Grundy, Peter. Doing Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press, (2000).

Gunarwan, Asim. Pragmatik: Teori dan Kajian Nusantara. Jakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya, (2007).

Hartley, Peter. Interpersonal Communication. London: Routledge, (1999).

Jaman, I Gede. Tri Hita Karana dalam Konsep Hindu. Denpasar: Pustaka Bali Pos, (2007).

Kramsch, Claire. Language and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, (1998).

Krishna, Anand. Tri Hita Karana: Ancient Balinese Wisdom for Neo Humans. Surabaya: Anand Krishna Global Co-Operation, (2008).

Leech, Geoffrey. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman, (1983).

Mayring, Philipp. Qualitative Content Analysis [28 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Art. 20; http://www.qualitative research.net/index.php/fqs/ article/view/1089/2385 (diakses 30 Oktober 2011).

Prabhupada, Sri Srimad A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami. Bhagavad-Gita As It Is. Mumbai: The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust, (1986).

____. Pedoman Etika dan Pola Hidup Vaishnava. Denpasar: Sampradaya Kesadaran Krishna Indonesia, (2007).

Rahardi, R. Kunjana. Pragmatik: Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga, (2005).

Schiffrin, Deborah. Approaches to Discourse. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publisher, (1994).

Suhardana, K. M. Pengantar Etika dan Moralitas Hindu: Bahan Kajian untuk Memperbaiki Tingkah Laku. Surabaya: Paramita, (2006).

Swami, Acyutananda dan Jayasacinandana Dasa. Lagu-Lagu Para Acarya Vaisnava. Jakarta: Pustaka Bhaktivedanta, (1972).

Wardaugh, Ronald. An Introduction of Sociolinguistics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, (1986).

Watts, Richard J. Politeness. New York: Cambridge University Press, (2003).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31327/jee.v1i2.100

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 1089 times
PDF - 412 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Wayan Pageyasa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.