Interactive Preposition Game to Improve the Usage of Preposition of Place Among Year 4 Pupils

Johan Emir Uzair Farhan(1*),

(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study was designed to improve the pupils’ grammar specifically in preposition of place using Interactive Preposition Game (IPG) as a teaching and learning strategy. The participants of the study were Year 4 pupils from a primary school and the researcher was the teacher who conducted the action research in the classroom and the cycle of the intervention had been done once. The data collected were tests, supported with interview and teacher’s reflective journal. Improvement was shown based on the data obtained as there was an increase of mean scores in the second test (82%) compared to first test (25%). Moreover, it was found that IPG was able to enhance pupils’ understanding, motivation and promote fun learning in the classroom. The results of the study indicated that the pupils had positive behaviours and responses towards the use of IPG in learning grammar.


Keywords


interactive, preposition, game, preposition of place, grammar

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bahous, R., Bacha, N., N., & Nabhani, M. (2011). Motivating Students in the EFL Classroom: A Case Study of Perspectives. English Language Teaching, 4 (3),33-43. Retrieved from http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/ viewFile/11873/ 8333

Beauvais, P. & Morenberg, M. (2007). Doing Grammar. College Composition and Communication, 43(2), p.270. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/357576.

Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The Action Research Planner (3rd ed.). Geelong: Deakin University Press.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. California: Pergamon Press Inc.

Lindstromberg, S. (2001). Preposition entries in UK monolingual learners' dictionaries: problems and possible solutions. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), pp.79-103. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.79.

Mayer, R. E. (2005). The cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mills, G., Gay, L. & Gay, L. (2014). Educational research (5th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.

Mukundan, J. & Roslim, N. (2009). Textbook Representation of Prepositions. English Language Teaching, 2(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v2n4p13.

Parveen, J. J., & Rajesh, V. (2011). Multimedia in English language teaching: An empirical analysis. Journal of Technology for ELT, 1 (4), 112-116.

Rabah, J. (2015). Benefits and challenges of information and communication technologies (ICT) integration in Quebec English schools. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14 (2), 24-31. Retrieved from http://www.tojet.net/articles/v14i2/1424.pdf

Ranjit, S. (2011).Use of ICT in learning of English pronunciation, grammar, and vocabulary of secondary school students. International Journal of Research In Commerce, It & Management, 1 (6), 125-130.

Rumsey, D. (2011). Statistics for dummies, (2nd Edition). John Wiley & Sons.

Sorden, S.D. (2012). The cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Retrieved from http://sorden.com/portfolio/sorden_draft_multimedia2012.pdf




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31327/jee.v8i2.2081

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 70 times
PDF - 26 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Johan Emir Uzair Farhan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.